Quality and Compliance

Find the gap before the audit does

A company tracks regulatory requirements and who owns each one in a spreadsheet that's out of date the moment a regulation changes, so compliance gaps surface during an audit instead of before one. Build a system where control status is always current, not reconstructed under deadline.

A control without current evidence is just a claim

A spreadsheet listing "we have a control for this" doesn't tell you whether the evidence behind it is still valid. Evidence expires, owners change roles, and requirements get updated—none of which a static list catches on its own.

Tie each control to an owner and current evidence, and let expiry automatically flag a gap instead of waiting for the next audit.

From requirement to remediation
  1. 1. Requirement or control is defined and assigned an owner
  2. 2. Evidence is collected to demonstrate the control is in place
  3. 3. Reviewer periodically reassesses the control and evidence
  4. 4. Gaps or expired evidence trigger a remediation task
  5. 5. Compliance status rolls up to a reportable dashboard
Who uses it

Three views of the same control

Control owner

See assigned controls, upload evidence, and respond to remediation tasks when a gap is flagged.

Reviewer

Periodically reassess controls and evidence, and approve or request a refresh.

Compliance manager

A compliance dashboard by regulation and control status, with overdue reviews and remediations.

What the system tracks and automates

Records

Requirements and controls, owners, evidence, reviews, remediation tasks.

Automations

Evidence-expiry reminders, review-cycle scheduling, and remediation escalation.

Custom logic

Regulation-specific review cycles, and control criticality weighting.

Platform

Own the application. P2HS runs the platform.

Example build brief

Example prompt
Build a compliance management platform with requirement/control tracking, owner assignment, evidence collection, periodic review, and remediation tracking for gaps.

Scenarios to test in your preview

  • A control must be flagged non-compliant automatically when its evidence expires, not wait for the next manual review.
  • A remediation task must stay linked to the control that triggered it.
  • Reassigning a control to a new owner must not lose its evidence and review history.
FAQ

Common questions about compliance management software

Who is this for?

Compliance teams tracking multiple regulations or frameworks who need current, evidenced control status instead of a static spreadsheet.

Does this cover a specific regulation?

The structure is regulation-agnostic—define the requirements and controls that apply to your specific compliance obligations.

How is this different from evidence management?

This tracks the controls themselves. Compliance evidence management is the focused version if evidence collection is your immediate pain point.

Related platform pages

See how compliance management fits into the wider P2HS platform.

Build the compliance platform that stays current

Describe the workflow. Review the foundation. Launch it on your own domain.