Quality and Compliance

Stop fixing the same problem three times

A company tracks corrective actions in email threads, so a recurring problem gets "fixed" the same way three times because nobody can see it was already addressed and failed. Build a CAPA record that proves whether a fix actually worked.

Start Building Explore More Solutions

Closure without verification isn't closure

A CAPA marked "done" in an email thread tells you someone took an action. It doesn't tell you whether the action actually stopped the problem from recurring—and without that check, the same root cause quietly resurfaces.

Require an effectiveness check before a CAPA can close, so "done" means verified, not just attempted.

From request to verified closure
  1. 1. Issue or nonconformance triggers a CAPA request
  2. 2. Root cause analysis is documented
  3. 3. Corrective action is planned, assigned, and approved
  4. 4. Action is implemented and evidence is logged
  5. 5. Effectiveness is verified after a defined period before closure
Who uses it

Three views of the same CAPA

Requester

Raise a CAPA request from an issue, and track its status through to verified closure.

Investigator

Document root cause, plan the corrective action, and log evidence as it's implemented.

Quality manager

An open-CAPA dashboard by status, severity, and owner, with overdue escalation and recurring-issue detection.

What the system tracks and automates

Records

CAPA requests, root cause analysis, action plans, evidence, effectiveness checks.

Automations

Due-date escalation, approval routing by severity, and effectiveness-check reminders.

Integrations

Document storage, email or SMS notifications, and a supplier portal when the action involves a supplier. See supported integrations.

Custom logic

Severity-based approval chains, and recurring-issue linking to prior CAPAs.

Platform

Own the application. P2HS runs the platform.

Example build brief

Example prompt
Build a CAPA management app with nonconformance-triggered requests, root cause documentation, corrective action assignment and approval, evidence tracking, and effectiveness verification before closure.

Scenarios to test in your preview

  • A CAPA must not close without a documented effectiveness check.
  • Reopening a CAPA after a failed effectiveness check must preserve the full prior history.
  • A CAPA linked to a recurring issue must surface the prior attempt, not start blind.
FAQ

Common questions about CAPA software

Who is this for?

Quality teams in manufacturing, healthcare, and other regulated industries that need corrective actions tracked to verified closure.

Is this the same as a QMS?

CAPA is one piece of a full quality management system. Start here if corrective actions are your immediate pain point.

Can suppliers respond to a CAPA directly?

Yes—give suppliers a scoped portal view when a corrective action involves them, similar to supplier quality management.

Related platform pages

See how CAPA management fits into the wider P2HS platform.

quality management system audit management nonconformance management full-stack AI app builder

Build the CAPA app that verifies before it closes

Describe the workflow. Review the foundation. Launch it on your own domain.

Start Building Explore More Solutions